Policing the Listening: Capitalism, Sensory Governance, and Auditory Discipline
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51191/issn.2637-1898.2025.8.14.28Keywords:
listening, soundscape, rhythmanalysis, Henri Lefebvre, auditory discipline, sensory governance, horror silentiiAbstract
This article investigates the politics of listening in late capitalist societies, focusing on how auditory perception is shaped, regulated, and policed through spatial, technological, and affective regimes. Developing the concept of the policescape – a spatialized system of sonic governance – it examines how listening is disciplined in everyday life. Drawing on Henri Lefebvre’s rhythmanalysis, the article outlines a postmusicological approach that shifts attention from musical objects to the politics of listening itself. Two key mechanisms of auditory discipline are analyzed: the public/private divide and what is termed horror silentii, or the fear of silence. These mechanisms enforce acoustic hierarchies, reinforce social boundaries, and suppress collective sensory presence. Central to this disciplinary regime is the fantasy of the auditory gated community – both as a physical structure and an aspirational fantasy of control – the neoliberal ideal of absolute control over one’s sonic environment. Within this logic, unwanted sounds in private space are experienced not as mere disturbances, but as personal failures of sovereignty. Listening, I argue, is not a neutral sensory act but a political operation embedded in structures of power, rhythm, and exclusion.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 INSAM Journal of Contemporary Music, Art and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes .
- NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.