Copying and Selling the Future’s Past: Buchla/Arp Replicas and Intangible Sonic Practice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51191/issn.2637-1898.2025.8.15.148

Keywords:

Electronic musical instruments, Preservation, Replication, Authenticity, Heritage studies, Intangible cultural heritage, Synthesizers, Buchla 100, ARP 2500

Abstract

This study investigates the role of replicas in the preservation and transmission of historically significant electronic musical instruments, focusing specifically on a DIY reconstruction of the Buchla 100 system and a mass-produced Eurorack reinterpretation of the ARP 2500 developed by Behringer. The inquiry is informed by fieldwork at the Willem Twee Studios in ‘s-Hertogenbosch, an institution notable for its commitment to maintaining rare synthesizers in an operational state and making them accessible to performers and the public. This approach foregrounds the tension between museological imperatives of conservation and the cultural value derived from continued sonic and performative engagement.
Replicas are here conceptualized as a form of second-order preservation, wherein the continuity of technical practice, sound production, and performance traditions is privileged over strict adherence to material authenticity. The LA67 Buchla 100 reconstruction exemplifies a fidelity-driven model of replication, seeking to reproduce the design and circuitry of the original 1960s system with minimal deviation. By contrast, Behringer’s ARP 2500 modules embody a corporate, consumer accessibility-oriented approach, reconfiguring the instrument within the standardized Eurorack format while sacrificing systemic and historical specificity. These contrasting strategies raise critical questions regarding authenticity, authority, and the extent to which replication practices democratize or dilute historical experience.
Drawing upon scholarship in musicology, heritage studies, and the study of technology, this paper argues that replicas function simultaneously as material artifacts and as conduits for intangible heritage. Beyond preserving circuitry or physical design, they sustain traditions of practice, performance, and aesthetic engagement that would otherwise be rendered inaccessible. While replicas cannot fully reproduce the historical aura of original instruments, they operate as vital agents in maintaining cultural lineages of electronic sound synthesis, ensuring continuity between past innovations and present communities of musicians, scholars, and practitioners.

Author Biography

  • Andreas Kitzmann, Department of Humanities, York University, Toronto, Canada

    Andreas Kitzmann, Associate Professor in the Department of Humanities at York University, received his PhD in comparative literature from McGill University and has written widely on the impact of communications technology on the construction and practice of identity, electronic communities, modular synthesis and the influence of new media on narrative conventions. Among his publications is Saved from Oblivion: Documenting the Daily from Diaries to Web Cams (Peter Lang, 2004) and Memory and Migration: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Memory Studies. Eds. Julia Creet and Andreas Kitzmann (University of Toronto Press).
    Professor Andreas Kitzmann has written widely on the impact of communications technology on the construction and practice of identity, electronic communities, and the influence of new media on narrative conventions. His current project focuses on the revival of analog technologies in the post-digital age with a specific interest in the modular synthesizer as a tool to think about the relationship between technology and creative practice.

References

Ahmed, Sara. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. London: Routledge.

Analogue Solutions. n.d. TC5000 Analogue Modular Synth with Full Width Pin Matrix for Patching. Accessed August 19, 2025. https://www.analoguesolutions.com/tc5000.

Barclay, Robert. 1997. The Care of Historic Musical Instruments. Ottawa: Canadian Conservation Institute.

Beekman, Tom. 2003. “Reconstructing the Renaissance: Making and Playing Early Instruments.” Journal of the American Musical Instrument Society 29: 45–66.

Behringer. n.d. 2600 Gray Meanie [Product webpage]. Accessed August 19, 2025. https://www.behringer.com/product.html?modelCode=0718-ABZ.

Behringer. n.d. Oscillator Module 1004 [Product webpage]. Accessed August 19, 2025. https://www.behringer.com/behringer/product?modelCode=0720-ABS.

Bell, Nancy, and David McPhail. 2007. “Managing Change: Preserving History.” Materials Today 10 (4): 50–56.

Brown-Cáceres, Nicole A. 2024. “Restoring the Buchla 100.” In the Muse: Performing Arts Blog. Library of Congress, August 26, 2024. Accessed August 20, 2025. https://blogs.loc.gov/music/2024/08/restoring-the-buchla-100/.

Buchla U.S.A. n.d. Systems Design – Product Line Overview [Webpage]. Accessed August 19, 2025. https://buchla.com/systems-design/.

Butt, John. 2002. Playing with History: The Historical Approach to Musical Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hobsbawm, Eric, and Terence Ranger, eds. 1983. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Holterbach, Emmanuel. 2013. “Peindre du temps et de l’espace avec des sons, la musique d’Éliane Radigue.” In Éliane Radigue: Portraits polychromes, edited by Daniel Teruggi, Evelyne Gayou, Pierre-Albert Castanet, and Christian Zanési, 8-71. Paris: Groupe de Recherches Musicales de l’Institut national de l’audiovisuel.

Howard, Keith. 2022. “Musical Instruments as Tangible Cultural Heritage and as/for Intangible Cultural Heritage.” International Journal of Cultural Property 29 (1): 23–44.

KSS. 2021. “Re: Behringer ARP 2500 Modules.” Online forum comment. ModWiggler Forum. August 22, 2021. https://modwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=234731&start=720.

La Sesenta y Siete. n.d. Mort’s Barge [Webpage]. Accessed August 19, 2025. https://www.lasesentaysiete.com/mort-s-barge.

Northrop, Anne. 2024. “Restoring the Buchla 100.” In the Muse: Performing Arts at the Library of Congress. Library of Congress, August 26, 2024. https://blogs.loc.gov/music/2024/08/restoring-the-buchla-100/.

Rognoni, Giulia. 2019. “Preserving Functionality: Keeping Artefacts ‘Alive’ in Museums.” The Museum Journal 62 (3): 403–13.

Sandis, Constantine. 2016. “An Honest Display of Fakery: Replicas and the Role of Museums.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 79: 241–59.

Shouse, Eric. 2005. “Feeling, Emotion, Affect.” M/C Journal 8 (6). https://journal.media-culture.org.au/0512/03-shouse.php.

Smith, Roger. 2007. “Silenced Instruments: The Ethical Implications of Museum Display.” Museum and Society 5 (3): 149–63.

Sommer, Roy. 2011. “Metadesign: A Mythological Approach to Self-Reference in Consumer Culture.” The Metareferential Turn in Contemporary Arts and Media. New York: Rodopi.

Synthtopia. 2019. “The Buchla ‘Red Panel’ LSD Legend Was True.” Synthtopia, May 22, 2019. Accessed August 19, 2025. https://www.synthtopia.com/content/2019/05/22/the-buchla-red-panel-lsd-legend-was-true/.

Taruskin, Richard. 1995. Text and Act: Essays on Music and Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

“Uli Behringer Responds to Recent Attacks”. 2020. FutureMusic, March 2020. Accessed August 19, 2025. https://futuremusic.com/2020/03/uli-behringer-responds-to-recent-attacks/.

Downloads

Published

25.12.2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Copying and Selling the Future’s Past: Buchla/Arp Replicas and Intangible Sonic Practice. (2025). INSAM Journal of Contemporary Music, Art and Technology, 15, 148-165. https://doi.org/10.51191/issn.2637-1898.2025.8.15.148

Similar Articles

1-10 of 87

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.